Well, sales taxes in general are regressive. Taxing salt, for example (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salt_Satyagraha), is way on up there. But not all sales taxes are regressive: what is a luxury tax other than a sales tax?
About internet sales, I'm not buying the regressivity argument. The kinds of things I buy via the internet are not necessities. Those things have a high value to weight ratio, not the characteristic of most necessities. Food, for example, is a necessity, but food ordered over the internet will tend toward expensive, luxury items. (Prescription drugs are a necessity and cut the other way, but they must make up a small fraction of internet sales.)
There’s some interesting data from 2008 at http://blogs.zdnet.com/ITFacts/?p=14001, which says that of folks who had bought online then, 19 percent had incomes over $100k, while 13 percent had incomes below $25k; of folks who had not bought online then, 7 percent had incomes over $100k, while 19 percent had incomes below $25k.
I don’t know enough about regressivity to make much of a conclusion. Amazon probably has a lot of data – ZIP codes would tell a lot – about the demographics of its customers, but I’m not holding my breath for disclosure.
Anyway, if you don't have a fixed address, computer access (OK, the library can supply that), internet literacy, and a credit card, I don't see how you can buy stuff over the internet.
No comments:
Post a Comment